Perhaps the most frightening thing about modern the modern Western psyche is the blatant refusal, despite the rise of so called 'liberalism', to acknowledge or even pay homage to the fact that their own cultural bias colours their view of the world. They cling incessantly to some sort of handhold with which to justify their bias, whether it be the Aristotelean values of Universal Truth or the pseudo-scientific precepts of the unbiased observer (which modern science has all but denounced, yet keeping it still in some form or another and still teaching it as the basics in elementary education, grounding children into this frame of mind).
I own several analytical 'scholarly' texts on sex from earlier decades (one of which I am currently reading, from the sixties) that goes so far as to quote the most 'esteemed' sexologist, Jacobus, in saying that Arabs are the greatest pederasts in the known world. While this may seem outrageous and shocking to the modern reader, to a philosopher and a socially aware individual the will behind such a statement is not at all unique even in our own time.
I refer not only to the masses who can do nothing but wallow in their own ignorance due to lack of exposure, but also to the so-called cultural elite, whose arrogant 'liberalism' and values of 'freedom' allow for them to cover the sham of their own bloody bias to the extent that they themselves seem to believe that they exist without bias and that they view things from a universal standpoint.
The refusal to acknowledge one's own bias, of course, not limited to Western culture, as an engendering into one's society is unavoidable on any level of any culture, however, it is Western (or perhaps, decidedly North American) culture that so obstinanty clings to their cries of their 'enlightened' and 'unbiased' natures to blind themselves from their own blindness.
The most disturbing thing about this venture is that I cannot see any means to end the perpetual cycle that Western culture has already embarked upon, thanks to human and societal tendencies towards ignorance and stupidity. Present the masses, or the so called 'elite' (which comprises of nothing but pseudo-intellectuals and the new class of the hard-working petty-bourgeois... to view things in class terms, which I will readily admit to doing on occasion) with a new idea like post-modernism or existentialism and they will appropriate it, pay subtle homage to it, then ram their fat cocks of ignorance into its anus by using it as the new watchword for their stupidity.
It's become such a perpetual cycle that, unlike in other cultures at present and in history, where ignorance is maintained by the upper-crust of society to maintain their hold on their most precious commodity: power (note, not money, though money is the means of power in a modern capitalist society, it is not money that is itself evil but the power which it represents), that the 'intellectuals' and the masses are doing it just fine and could continue doing so without the intervention of the outmoded power-hungry persons in office or in positions of power.
Though scorn is placed upon those in power, it is only when they flex their muscle of power and their own brand of ignorance onto others (which is the nature of power, to flex one's muscles over another, hence hatred is constantly engendered) that they are truely hated, not for the ignorance of values but for 'freedom'. Yet if power were not the prime commodity and the upper-crust capitalists removed from the system entirely, something else would take the place of money as the currency of power and perpetuate more of the same ignorance and idiocy that permeates through society today. This can be freely waning use of power over the people and the struggles and hoops by which dictatorial persons must leap through to attain their goals (it is no longer a simple matter of monkey say, armies do... the monkey now has to pass laws under the noses of the masses), yet the rising 'liberal' elite still marches on ignorantly, beating their chest over every issue, even when they have majority support.
This is not to say that the freedoms the liberal movement presents are not valuable, but that in the end they are but another fossilised ideal that they will not reach simply because of the huge human capacity for ignorance. Should the liberal movement triumph, simply another form of currency will take the place of money and the masses will yet be at the yoke of another elite, albeit a more benevolent elite, it is simply not an absolute definition of freedom. How could they possibly hope to do such a thing? The majority of them signed onto the movement with minimal thought, to follow a trend, and they themselves have perhaps read a minimal bit of Marxist theory and called that their extent of liberal knowledge!
Yet the masses engender it, and are not simply prepared themselves for absolute freedom. They enjoy their ignorance, bathe luxuriously in it. Yet all the while they beat their breasts and they say that they are not ignorant, that they know what the hell they are talking about.
In this, perhaps, Reagan was correct in his assessment of communism. He said, "How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." Yet what he obviously (since Reagan was no genius, as history proves) forgoes is the fact that almost no one who dons a mantle of any ideology has any idea what they speak of. A Marxist CAN understand Marxism, so long as they are aware that their views are forever coloured by their understanding of marxism, and so forth. It is impossible to apply your view to the universal without first assessing your own views!
Again we see this trend of thought arising in modern society in the philosophers of existentialist and post-modernist movements. I am not trying to say that such people do not EXIST at all, but that the followers of such philosophies tend to be, as usual, of the ignorant sort who then pretend to be enlightened, pretend a sense of goddamned superiority, yet never reflect upon their own wills and biases and thereby mock the human condition by exemplifying it outright.
What is the solution? I have no clue. No fucking clue. I've been working years on compiling a worthwhile solution (jokingly called The Manifesto) to any perfect utopian system, socialist, anarchist, whatever (and I still, despite being entirely disillusioned, refer to myself as a socialist) but it is impossible. The only solutions I can dream up, perhaps because I am myself human and impossibly attached to human paradigms (Damn you Heinlein, damn you and your damned fictional Martian... lucky bastards) only create new power structures. 'Better' power structures, perhaps, but still a human, imperfect, and inherently flawed one. Impossible, that is of course, short of a miraculous undertaking of divine intervention by which all humans are then acutely aware of themselves.
I have to go get showered and go out to lunch with a friend now, but those are my thoughts for now. Thoughts on human masks (my own) if I feel like writing about myself are to come later.